Search Results for "Telecom"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Telecom"

384 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Withdrawn in Cellphone Tower Installation Dispute — No Order as to Costs. Petitioner sought to forbid installation of a cellphone tower but withdrew the petition; court permitted withdrawal without adjudicating merits.

6 Jan 2025

The petitioner, M. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, s...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bharti Airtel Officials in Private Complaint for Lack of Vicarious Liability and Abuse of Process. The court held that continuing proceedings against directors and officers without specific allegations of their involvement would be an abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioners, who are the Chairman, Managing Director, CEO, and Nodal Officer of Bharti Airtel Ltd., filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Public Procurement Contract. Court holds that the decision of the employer to accept a bid with minor deviations is not arbitrary or mala fide and does not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

21 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Cyfuture India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of respo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Order 43 Rule 1(a) — Setting Aside Order Dismissing Application for Impleading Legal Representatives. The court held that the lower appellate court must consider sufficient cause for delay and the possibility of proceeding against other respondents before dismissing an application for impleading legal representatives.

14 Nov 2018

The appellant, Smt M Veena, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demand for Additional Charges for Power Supply to Housing Society. BESCOM's demand for additional infrastructure charges for power supply to a housing society was set aside as the society had already paid the required amount and the demand was not based on any statutory provision.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seek...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BESCOM Demand for Additional Charges in Electricity Connection Case — Society Entitled to Power Supply at Original Estimate Cost. Revised Intimation Letter and Confirmation Order Set Aside for Lack of Notice and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Leave to Defend Application Not a First Statement on Substance of Dispute. Filing of application for leave to defend under Order 37 CPC does not constitute submission of first statement on substance of dispute, and application under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed before written statement is within time.

9 Apr 2018

The appellant, Haier Telecom (India) Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Drive India Enterprise Solutions Ltd., fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Recalls Ex Parte Decree Due to Non-Compliance with Service Rules. Service of Summons Not in Accordance with Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, Leading to Recall of Decree Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

14 Dec 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendants Nos. 2 to 4 under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to recall an ex...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.

2 Jun 2015

The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in VAT Penalty Case — Revised Return Voluntarily Filed Before Notice Valid Under KVAT Act. Penalty under Section 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 cannot be imposed when revised return was filed voluntarily before any notice of assessment or penalty.

16 Apr 2015

The revision petitioner, M/s Indus Towers Limited, is engaged in providing passive infrastructure telecom services and is registered under the Karnata...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)