Search Results for "Reference court enhancement"

1550 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1550 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Motor Accident Claims Appeals Under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. Appeals Arise from Awards of Various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a batch of 23 Miscellaneous First Appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, filed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Decides First Appeal No. 107 of 1999 and Cross Objection No. 6 of 2000 in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. The appeal challenged enhancement of compensation from Rs.4.50-6 to Rs.89.25 per square metre under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a first appeal and cross objection arising from a land acquisition reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals under Section 173(1) of MV Act. The appeals arose from awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerning compensation for injuries and deaths in road accidents.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench heard a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals for Proper Market Value Determination. Reference Court's award based on averages set aside; matter remanded for fresh consideration of comparable sale instances and prior awards.

The judgment pertains to two First Appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings. The appellants, Dattatraya Ramchandra Chinchalikar through his l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...