CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2011
24 Jan 2012The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 23-2-2010 (or 23-2-2011) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in S...
Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"
517 result(s) found
Found 517 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Rape Case Acquittal Appeal — Appellants Acquitted of Rape but Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Assaulting Prosecutrix.
30 Nov 2010The appellants, Sonu Babu Pival and Kanta Sonu Pival, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995. They we...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent with Medical Report and Circumstances.
23 Sep 2011The appellant, Rattan Suka Lilke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Section 366 read with Section 34 IPC and ...
- 126
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Evidence Proves Attempt to Rape or Outraging Modesty in Case Involving Mentally Retarded Victim
2 Apr 2019This criminal appeal challenged the judgment and order dated 27/01/2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No.219 of...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delay in FIR. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
26 Nov 2010The appellant, Ananda Tatyaba Kadam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the ...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and SC/ST Act Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape Allegation.
3 Nov 2022The State of Karnataka, through the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Puttur, appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.10.2015 passed by ...
- 204
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape of Minor Case — Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. The court found the evidence of the 9-year-old prosecutrix credible and corroborated by medical evidence, leading to dismissal of the appeal.
29 Mar 2010The appellant, Shri Sambhaji Aba Mandale, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Section 376(2)(f) and Section 506 of the Indian Penal...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Penetration Under Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
15 Jul 2021The case involves two appeals arising from the judgment and order dated 27.02.2018 in Spl. SC/ST No.10/2016 passed by the II Additional District and S...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Cross Appeals Arising from Conviction of Beat Marshal for Rape, Wrongful Confinement, and Criminal Intimidation, and Acquittal for Violation of Prohibition Act. The appeals concern the conviction of a beat marshal for rape, wrongful confinement, and criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code, and the State's challenge to the acquittal under the Bombay Prohibition Act and the sentence imposed.
6 May 2011The matter arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, convicting the accused, a beat marshal, for raping a 17-year-old prosecutri...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years.
31 Jul 2019The appellant, Kawadu Madhukar Atram, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case 70 of 2016 ...
- 74
