Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

459 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 459 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prior sanction under Section 19 was not obtained and trap witnesses were not independent.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sinc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Dr. Nishikant Bhaskarrao Kulkarni (sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramdas Waman Tadge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, in Special (A.C.B.) Case No. 01 of 2008 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Abated Due to Death of Appellant in Corruption Case. Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Abates Under Section 394 CrPC as No Legal Heir Can Continue Challenge to Conviction.

The appellant, Vijay Parvatrao Salunkhe, a police constable, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Failure to Prove Public Servant Status. Trial Court's finding that accused was not a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, despite acceptance of bribe amount, leads to acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Nagorao Vithobaji Motghare, a Line Helper with M.S.E.B., for offences under Sections 7, 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Accused in Corruption Case to Obtain Pre-FIR Enquiry Documents for Defence — Right to Fair Trial Under Article 21 Includes Access to Documents Referred to in Chargesheet Under Section 207 CrPC.

The petitioners, Dhondiba s/o Namdeo Dhonde and Kusumbai w/o Dhondiba Dhonde, were accused in a trial under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Junior Engineer in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the demand of bribe, which is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, a Junior Engineer in the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (M.S.E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Manohar Rangnath Jagtap, was working as an Accountant at Mahatma Phule Magaswarg Vikas Mahamandal, Buldana, responsible for issuing sub...