Search Results for "Premium FAR"

861 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 861 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Deceased Shop Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Notional Income Increased from Rs.4,500 to Rs.6,000 per Month. Claim for Personal Accident Cover and Special Contract Premium Rejected for Lack of Evidence.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 07.09.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Gondal, in Motor Accident Cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence and Lower Income Assessment. Claimant's failure to prove income and own negligence led to 50% reduction in awarded amount.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the original claimant, Krishnamurari Ramsevak Mahanto, who suffered severe injuries due ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Demanding Excess Lease Premium in Industrial Land Allotment — Refund of Rs. 100 Lakhs Ordered with Interest. KIADB Cannot Charge Premium Exceeding Government-Notified Rate Under Section 3(1) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Hadee Forging Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was allotted 2 acres of industrial land by the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in MFA No. 894 of 2020. Claimant awarded Rs. 2,50,000/- for injuries sustained in road accident under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant-claimant, Sri Milind Kunale, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Power of Municipal Commissioner to Revoke Occupancy Certificate in Challenge by Co-operative Society and Developer. Core Issue: Whether Municipal Commissioner Had Authority to Cancel Occupancy Certificate Granted Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The writ petition was filed by M/s. Satra Plaza Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...