Search Results for "Pleading and evidence"

2164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Temple Pooja Rights Dispute. Appeals under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenge trial court's order restraining interference with hereditary archakas' rights at Shree Mahabaleshwara Temple.

The miscellaneous first appeals arose from a common order dated 2020-02-19 passed in Original Suit No. 2 of 2016 by the Principal District and Session...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitrator’s Interim Order in Film Remake Rights Case. Dispute Involves Enforcement of Agreement Dated 24 January 2012 Granting Remake Rights of Film 'Zanjeer' and Payment of Instalments.

The petition was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an interim order dated 16 July 2012 passed by the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...