Search Results for "POCSO"

520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO Case for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor — Life Sentence Confirmed. Court holds that minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not undermine credibility when corroborated by medical evidence and prompt complaint.

The appellant-accused, Tabrez Rojuddin Ansari, was convicted by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case — Upholds Conviction for Rape of Five-Year-Old Based on DNA Evidence. Semen on Victim's Clothes Matched Accused's DNA, Corroborating Victim's Account Despite Absence of Physical Injuries.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the accused for the rape of a five-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(i)(j) IPC and Section 5(m)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Accused to Adduce Defence Evidence in POCSO Case — Rejection of Plea by Trial Court Set Aside. Right to Fair Trial Under Section 482 CrPC Includes Opportunity to Present Defence Witnesses Even After Prosecution Evidence Closed.

The petitioner, Sri Periyaswamy M., filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5(j)(ii) and (l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(j)(n) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Riyaz @ Riyaz Pasha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.80/2014 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consensual Relationship. The court held that at the bail stage, a prima facie case is to be seen, and since the victim supported the accused and age was disputed, bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar K.S., accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment concerns five criminal appeals filed by multiple appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the allegations.

The appellant, Narayana Swamy, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in Spl.S.C.No.3...