Search Results for "Orissa Entry Tax Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Orissa Entry Tax Act"

177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Tribal Chieftains in Land Acquisition Case Under Assam Lushai Hills District (Acquisition of Chief's Rights) Act, 1954. The petition was barred by delay and laches, and the acquisition of chiefs' lands with compensation under the Act did not violate fundamental rights to property.

13 Mar 2026

The writ petition was filed by the Mizo Chief Council on behalf of tribal chieftains and their legal heirs from the erstwhile Lushai Hills district, n...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Normalization Process in Police Recruitment — Equi-Percentile Method Valid for Multi-Session Exams. Standardized Equi-Percentile Method for Normalization of Marks Across Different Sessions of Written Examination Held Permissible Under Uttar Pradesh Sub Inspector and Inspector (Police) Service Rules, 2015.

7 Jan 2022

The case pertains to the recruitment process for 2400 posts of Sub-Inspector of Police, 210 posts of Platoon Commander (PAC), and 97 posts of Fire Off...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute — Date of Appointment Prevails Over Year of Vacancy. Promotees appointed on 01.03.2007 are senior to direct recruits appointed on 14.08.2007 and 24.11.2007 under the Manipur Police Service Rules, 1965.

19 Nov 2019

The case involves an inter-se seniority dispute between promotees and direct recruits in the Manipur Police Service Grade II Officers Cadre. The promo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

3 Aug 2019

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

13 Jul 2017

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Royalty Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007 — Limitation Circular of 2011 Held Applicable to Claims Filed After Its Issuance. The court upheld the rejection of a claim for refund of royalty for the year 2011-2012 as time-barred under a government circular dated 17.06.2011, even though the eligibility certificate was issued earlier.

7 Apr 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Chinteshwar Steel Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Act Case — Confiscation and Penalties Quashed for Lack of Mens Rea. Imported capital goods released on payment of duty; no deliberate intent to evade duty established under Sections 111(d), 111(f), 112(a), and 125 of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Jan 2014

The petitioners, M/s. Central Cables Limited (a company manufacturing electric wires and cables), its Managing Director Govind Daga, and Purchase Offi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

28 Aug 2013

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Customs Duty Demand for Goods Imported at Different Port. Commissioner of Customs, Bombay lacks jurisdiction to demand duty for goods imported at New Delhi under an advance licence after change of port of registration.

14 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Vimal Nath, carrying on business as M/s Sharika Intl, was issued an advance licence on 16/2/1994 by licensing authorities at Delhi per...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Receiver in Family Property Dispute. Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case for Receiver When Property is in Possession of Defendants and Alternative Remedy of Partition is Available.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar, filed a suit for partition and accounts against his family members, including his mother, brothers, sisters...

15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)