Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures by Nashik Municipal Corporation Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Demolition Without Prior Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 53A of MRTP Act and Section 169 of MMC Act.

The judgment involves a group of writ petitions filed by individuals and businesses challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nashik Munic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Based on Unregistered Will — Revenue Authorities Directed to Delete Entry and Restore Original Names. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Must Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Ghatshendra, Kannad, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation of their names in the revenue records in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation from ₹450 to ₹360 per sq. metre for Devasthan Property. Deduction of 10% applied due to restrictions under Devasthan Regulation on sale of trust properties.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the Executive Engineer, Works Division VII, Public Works Department, Government of Goa, challenging the Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Agricultural Land with Non-Agricultural Potential. Multiplier Method Applied to Determine Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals filed by the claimants, Ganpat Laxman Vesmode and Ahmedsahab Abdulsaab, against the judgment and award dated 30th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Children's Playground — Upholds Validity of Notification Under MRTP Act and Land Acquisition Act. Change of Purpose from Hospital to Playground Does Not Vitiate Acquisition as Public Purpose Remains.

The petitioners, Shyamkant Sitaram Joshi and Mrs. Malati Madhukar Pande, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a notification dat...