WRIT PETITION NO. 7034 OF 2024
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Money lending"
493 result(s) found
Found 493 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Bank in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessing Officer Had Already Considered Exemption Claim During Original Assessment.
21 Sep 2020The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 30.03.2001 issued...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Orders Refund of Earnest Money with Interest. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness, but defendants cannot forfeit earnest money without proof of loss.
26 Aug 2024The original plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 20.02.2008 in respect of a suit property admeasuring 70,000...
- 324
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Rebuttal of Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Requires Evidence, Not Mere Denial. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, operates in favour of the complainant and the accused must rebut it with credible evidence, not mere suggestions.
19 Jan 2026The appellant, Rajesh Darshanlal Gupta, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and or...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Improper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice by Under Postal Certificate (UPC) instead of registered post with acknowledgement due does not meet the requirement of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, leading to quashing of FIR.
15 Mar 2017The applicants, Suhas @ Pappu s/o Sarjerao Kakade and Sachin s/o Vithalrao Dagdu, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Crimin...
- 52
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.
19 Feb 2026The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision and Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Cases — Conviction Restored for One Cheque, Acquittal Set Aside for Another. The court upheld the conviction of the accused in one case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and set aside the acquittal in another case, holding that the presumption under Section 139 was not rebutted in the first case, while in the second case the debt was time-barred and not legally enforceable.
22 Mar 2025The judgment involves two connected matters: Criminal Revision Petition No.400/2016 and Criminal Revision Petition No.401/2016 filed by Sri D. Vijay (...
- 118
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and RBI Circular on Stressed Assets Resolution. The Court held that the RBI circular dated 12.02.2018 is valid and not arbitrary, and that the requirement of 100% lender consent for restructuring and mandatory IBC reference for large accounts is within RBI's powers.
2 Apr 2019The present batch of petitions and transferred cases challenged the constitutional validity of Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1...
- 221
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved, Limitation Barred Suit. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and payment of earnest money; suit filed beyond three years from date of refusal.
29 Apr 2025The present Regular First Appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 03.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad, in O....
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Agricultural Land — Plaintiff Proves Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the appellant had continuously shown readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and there was no valid ground to deny specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
20 Nov 2013The appellant, Shrikrishna Ganuji Sonone, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell an agricultural field (Gat No.36, admeasuring ...
- 41
