Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

220 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 220 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Mining Contract Interest Dispute — Security Deposit Does Not Carry Interest Despite Delayed Refund When Contract Expressly Bars Interest. Clause 19 of Form-L Contract Under Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964 Precludes Interest on Security Deposit, and Section 34 CPC Does Not Apply to Contractual Deposits.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by the Appellants and its officers against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which directed payment of interes...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates First Appeal Concerning Title to Mira Salt Works Lands and Validity of Revenue Authorities' Orders. Appeal raises questions on ownership under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, and interpretation of Government of India Act, 1935, in the context of lands originally held under indenture of lease.

30 Apr 2026

The First Appeal arises from the dismissal of Special Civil Suit No.771 of 2011 by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, on 13 April 2018...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC, MMRD Act, and Motor Vehicles Act. Conviction Under MMRD Act Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 22 Bar on Police Cognizance, While Theft and Motor Vehicles Convictions Upheld Based on Official Witness Evidence.

7 Feb 2020

Background: The case involves a criminal appeal filed before the Karnataka High Court against the judgment of conviction dated 03.01.2018 by the Princ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Illegal Mining Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Mines and Mineral Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of minerals beyond reasonable doubt.

7 Aug 2019

The appellants, Dinesh and Cheluvamurthy, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions and Special Judge at Mysuru in Special Case No.85/2018 for offe...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Seized Sand in Excess of Transit Permit — Distinguishes Between Illegal Excavation and Excess Transport from Lawful Source. Section 48(7),(8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 not attracted when sand is from a lawful licensee, as State has no right over such sand.

15 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Harihar Puri, owned a truck (MH30AV1008) that was intercepted by the Tahsildar, Armori on 24 September 2018 while transporting sand. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

21 Aug 2018

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Instructions Prohibiting Transportation of Ready Mix Plaster from Gujarat to Maharashtra. Instructions Based on Gujarat Notification for Sand Held Inapplicable to Ready Mix Plaster, Violating Article 301 of Constitution.

6 Feb 2018

The petitioners, Dipak Logistics and Forwarders and Shiv Enterprise, challenged instructions issued by the Collector, Palghar (Respondent No.2) prohib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Reemployment of CMD of Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited. Court holds that reemployment policy for CPSEs is governed by DPE guidelines, not Handbook for Personnel Officers.

4 Feb 2016

The petitioner, a retired accountant and public-spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeki...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)