Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Zilla Parishad Councillor for Having Three Children Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Family Planning Policy Enforced Strictly to Curb Population Explosion.

The petitioner, Gautam s/o Rama Latke, was elected as a Councillor from the Anala (30) Constituency of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad. He was aggrieved by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contract with Gram Panchayat. Joint Ownership of Hotel Property with License from Panchayat Constitutes Interest in Contract Under Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The Petitioner, Jijabai Tukaram Gaikwad, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat Takave (Budruk) in 2015. The Respondent N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Levy of VAT on Liquor by Certain Licensees; Alleged Discrimination Between Different Categories of Excise Licence Holders. Petitioners Contend That Notification Exempting Some Dealers While Taxing Others Violates Articles 14, 19, and 304B of the Constitution.

The writ petitions were filed by various licensees under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1967, challenging the constitutional validity of Entry No.59A of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Returning Officer's Rejection of Nomination Paper Over Name Discrepancy in Caste Certificate. The Court Held That an Undertaking Clarifying Maiden Name Due to Marriage is Sufficient, and Rejection Amounts to an Error Apparent on Record, Warranting Intervention Under Article 226.

The petitioner, a homemaker, sought to contest the election for a reserved seat of Scheduled Caste candidate in Ward No. 3 of Gram Panchayat Karli, Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court Holds That Removal of Sarpanch by No Confidence Motion Does Not Require Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 55(2A) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bharat Vitthal Shete, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Pimpalgaon Khand. A no confidence motion was moved against him by respondent N...