Search Results for "Maharashtra Excise"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Ab Initio Service Tax Exemption for SEZ Unit. Procedural Condition of Authorization Does Not Delay Exemption from Date of Application Under Notification No.12 of 2013.

The petitioner, Sai Wardha Power Company Limited, a power generating unit in the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) at Warora, filed a writ petition seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging GST on DAP and MOP Fertilizers Under Reverse Charge. Fertilizer dealers cannot claim exemption for DAP and MOP as they are mineral fertilizers, not chemical fertilizers, under Notification No. 9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

The petitioners, Ambica Fertilizers, Balaji Agro Agency, Mahesh Agro Agency, and Shree Ambica Fertilizers, are dealers in fertilizers including Di-Amm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Custody of Seized Truck in Excise Case — Modifies Onerous Condition of Bank Guarantee Under Section 457 CrPC. Truck Owner Not Required to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Full Value; Reasonable Conditions to Be Imposed.

The applicant, Jilani Nasiruddin Gore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...