Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Forest Development Corporation Case — Termination Without Domestic Inquiry Invalid Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's failure to conduct proper inquiry and denial of opportunity to lead evidence renders termination illegal, warranting reinstatement with back wages.

27 Sep 2011

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM) challenging the orders of the Labour Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows CIDCO's Petition, Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Employment of Contractual Employee. Contractual Appointment with Breaks Does Not Automatically Confer Right to Permanency Under MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging an order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Petitioner failed to prove continuous service of 240 days under Section 28(1) of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

13 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Pramod Raghunathrao Deshpande, filed a complaint under Section 28(1) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Quashing Punishment for Illegal Strike. Dispute Centers on Whether Industrial Court Could Interfere with Disciplinary Action and Draw Adverse Inference from Alleged Minutes of Meeting.

3 Feb 2016

These are six writ petitions filed by the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging the common order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Admission of Employment Date Cannot Be Withdrawn at Fag End of Trial Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

5 Jan 2010

The case arises from a complaint filed by the workman (respondent no.1) under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act Held Not Maintainable for Lack of Jurisdictional Error.

2 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Rohit Dembiwal, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Preliminary Issue of Enquiry Fairness Must Be Decided First. The Industrial Court correctly set aside the Labour Court's order deferring the decision on the preliminary issue of legality of domestic enquiry to the final stage, as per settled law under Section 28(1) and Section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

7 Dec 2018

The Petitioner, a Co-operative Credit Society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, employed the Respondent as a Secretar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Revisional Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The Labour Court's findings of fact, based on evidence, cannot be interfered with in revision without a finding of perversity or jurisdictional error.

14 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Raju Purushottam Warurkar, was employed as a printer with the respondent firm, Bokey Printers, from 1985, with confirmation in 1987. O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition and Dismisses Union's Petition in Industrial Dispute Over Recognition of Union. Industrial Court's interim order directing recognition of union as sole bargaining agent set aside as beyond jurisdiction under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act.

19 Dec 2025

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging an interim order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)