Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Order Quashing Environmental Clearance for Peripheral Ring Road Due to Stale EIA Data. Primary Data Collected Over Three Years Before Submission Invalidates Clearance Under EIA Notification 2006.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in KVAT Act Classification Dispute — Authority for Clarification & Advance Rulings Not Properly Constituted Under Section 60. Product 'Yakult' Held Entitled to Benefit of Entry 19 of First Schedule as Milk Product, Taxable at 4% Not 14%.

The appellant, Yakult Danone India Pvt Ltd, is the manufacturer of a product called 'Yakult', which it claimed is akin to 'lassi' and thus a milk prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Appeals Against Reassessment Notice Under KVAT Act Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 52(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The appellant, M/s Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd., engaged in construction, supply, erection and commissioning of cooling towers, was issued a notice un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...