Search Results for "Infrastructure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Infrastructure"

2282 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2282 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objection from Authorities and Compliance with Statutory Requirements. The court held that the scheme was fair and reasonable and sanctioned it, dissolving the Transferor Companies without winding up.

30 Nov -0001

This is a judgment of the Bombay High Court in a company summons for direction under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

13 Mar 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land. The court upheld the Reference Court's determination of market value at Rs. 1,50,000/- per acre, applying a 20% deduction for development charges, and rejected the claimant's plea for further enhancement.

12 Feb 2013

The case pertains to land acquisition for the Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project. The land in question, measuring 1 acre 20 guntas in Bijapu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Fourteen Transferor Companies with Transferee Company under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 — No Objection from Creditors or Shareholders. The court found the scheme just and fair and not contrary to public interest, sanctioning it with dissolution of transferor companies without winding up.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a Company Summons for Direction filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a scheme of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Thirteen Transferor Companies with Pebble Bay Developers Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from shareholders or creditors.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a Company Summons for Direction filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a scheme of amal...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

10 Feb 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Whether Registrar NCLT Can Scrutinize Maintainability of Section 95 IBC Petition at Filing Stage. Appeal Challenges Single Judge's Order Holding E-Filing of Insolvency Petition Against Partnership Firm Void and Non-Est.

16 Oct 2024

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Manyata Reallty, a partnership firm, challenging the e-filing of a petition under Section 95 of the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Takes Suo Moto Cognizance of COVID-19 Public Health Infrastructure in Maharashtra. Court Refers to Earlier Principal Seat Judgment Highlighting State's Obligation Under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Disaster Management Act, 2005.

18 Aug 2020

On 26.06.2020, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, registered Suo Moto Criminal Public Interest Litigation No.1 of 2020 to ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Resolution Granting Letter of Intent for New Colleges, Holds State's Discretion Under Section 109(3)(d) of Maharashtra Public Universities Act Must Be Non-Arbitrary. Refusal Based on Extraneous Factors Like Age of Institution Violates Article 14 of Constitution.

21 Feb 2024

The matter pertained to the establishment of a new college in Taluka-Haveli, Pune, under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 1960. The petitioner...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)