Search Results for "CrPC Section 102"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes FIRs in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of cheating, forgery, and criminal trespass found to be civil disputes without criminal ingredients under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 IPC.

The judgment concerns three connected criminal writ petitions arising from a land dispute in Salvador-Do-Mundo, Goa. The petitioners in WPCR 64/2021 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Licensee in Essential Commodities Act Case for Lack of Mandatory Sanction. Prosecution for Illegal Diesel Transportation Fails as No Sanction Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Was Obtained.

The petitioner, Sadiq Pasha, a licensed transporter of diesel and operator of SWS & Sons Petrol Bunk, challenged the FIR in Crime No.137/2022 register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sanction and Complaint in Income Tax Prosecution for Non-Application of Mind. Sanctioning Authority Failed to Consider Petitioner's Explanation and Appeal Pendency Under Section 276C(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Nayan Jayantilal Balu, engaged in trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2009-10 on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Advocate for Criminal Contempt for Disrupting Court Proceedings and Threatening Judge. Advocate's conduct of shouting, snatching notebook, and threatening judge amounts to criminal contempt under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The present criminal contempt petition was filed by Ashok Govindrao Bilolikar, the II Adhoc Additional District and Sessions Judge at Parbhani, under ...