Search Results for "Compulsory acquisition"

506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.

The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years from Section 6 Declaration Renders Acquisition Proceedings Void.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Maruti Genba Veer and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Held Validly Taken Despite Existence of Structures. Panchnama and Rapat Sufficient to Constitute Taking of Possession Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Haryana appealed against the High Court's judgment that declared the acquisition of the respondent's land as lapsed under Section 24(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Western Coalfields Ltd.'s Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development.

The case involves four first appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Reference Court in land acquisition matter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Minister Exceeded Powers by Exercising Authority After Possession Was Taken and Title Vested in State.

The petitioner, Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority, established under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 for developing a n...