Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Bombay Rent Act exemption"

218 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 218 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Restricting OCI Cardholders' Admission Rights in Medical Education Under Citizenship Act. Court Held That Impugned Notification Violated Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution as It Discriminated Against OCI Cardholders Without Reasonable Classification, Given Their Long Residence in India and Vacant Seats Data.

3 Feb 2023

The dispute involved Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) cardholders, who are students aspiring to pursue MBBS and higher medical courses through NEET se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board Employees to Continue Until 60 Years, Quashes Retirement at 58. Employees appointed under Wakf Act, 1954 and Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, 1964 are entitled to retirement age of 60 years as per Section 79 of Wakf Act, 1995, not 58 years under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules.

26 Sep 2022

The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, were appointed under the Wakf Act, 1954 and the Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

7 Oct 2019

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Rejection of Specific Performance and Damages in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Non-Compliance with Conditions Precedent and Lack of Proof of Damages Are Not Patently Illegal.

9 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Om Shiv Constructions, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

25 Feb 2014

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession of Party Premises; Issues of Maintainability of Representative Suit and Effect of Election Commission Recognition on Property Rights Considered

11 Oct 2013

The dispute concerns premises No.3, Race Course Road, Bangalore, claimed by the Indian National Congress through its Karnataka Pradesh Congress Commit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

13 Dec 2010

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in DEPB Taxation Case - Face Value of Duty Entitlement Passbook Chargeable Under Section 28(iiib) at Accrual, Excess Over Face Value Under Section 28(iiid) at Sale. The court held that the Tribunal erred in holding that the entire sale proceeds of DEPB are not profits under Section 28(iiid) and that face value should be deducted from sale proceeds.

28 Jun 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from a decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Port Trust's Claim for Demurrage Prior to Confiscation Order: Suit Not Barred by Limitation. Right to Sue Accrues on Date of Confiscation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963, and Not at Expiry of Free Days Despite Board's Powers Under Sections 61 and 62 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

15 Dec 2006

This is a suit filed by the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay against an importer for recovery of port trust charges (wharfage and demurrage) ac...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)