Search Results for "Article 201"

1434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Recovery of Weapon and Last Seen Together Forms Basis of Prosecution Case Under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

The appeals arose from the judgment and order dated 27 January 2012 in Sessions Case No. 124/2010, by which the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence Due to Lack of Conclusive Proof. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.100180/2021 filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 377(1)(b) CrPC seeking enhancement of sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Withdrawal of Criminal Complaint Due to Petitioner's Terminal Illness and Non-Prosecution. Petitioner suffering from nasopharyngeal cancer permitted to withdraw complaint and quash FIR under Section 482 CrPC as continuation would be abuse of process.

The petitioner, Ravinder Chohan, a UK resident suffering from nasopharyngeal cancer, filed a criminal complaint in 2015 against respondents 2 to 5 all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...