Search Results for "Action Ispat case"

179 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 179 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchase Case — GP Rate Restricted to 15% on Alleged Bogus Purchases. The court held that when purchases are accepted as genuine but from bogus parties, only the profit element embedded in such purchases can be taxed, not the entire purchase amount.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Complaint for Non-Compliance with BNSS Section 223 Procedure. Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage under first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Siddappa Bankar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Interim Injunction in Franchise Dispute Over Trademark Use. Negative Covenant in Franchise Agreement Restrains Use of Mark Containing 'Kamats' After Termination.

The dispute arose out of a franchise agreement dated 24 March 2011 between Deepak Thorat (Petitioner) and Vidli Restaurant Ltd. (Respondent), with Vit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Dispute as to Existence of Debt. Disputed invoices and lack of proper demand notice under Section 434 of Companies Act, 1956 render winding up proceedings unsustainable.

The appeal arose from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 23 February 2015 admitting a company petition for winding up filed by the respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Price Revision Upheld as Valid Modification. Letter dated 28 June 1999 held to have modified the terms of the Purchase Order, allowing recoveries and adjustments per letter dated 31 October 2000.

The petitioner, M/s. JCL International Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., on 1 May 1999 for the sup...