Search Results for "arbitrary administrative action"

1985 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1985 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Competition Commission's Power to Differ from DG Report and Penalty Principles Under Competition Act, 2002. Appeal Against COMPAT Order Partially Setting Aside Penalties and Behavioural Remedies Raises Interpretation of Sections 3, 27, and 48.

The present statutory appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 was filed by the Competition Commission of India against the judgment and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Green Tribunal Act Case Upholding Illegal Storage Facility Removal. Ex Post Facto Clearance Under 2011 Notification Invalid as Storage Terminal Not Located 'In' Notified Port Under Paragraph 8 of Environment Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals were lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, challenging the National Green Tribunal's order that set aside an e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Pay Scale Parity Dispute for Naval Civilian Officers. Judicial Review Limited as Pay Fixation is Primarily an Executive Function Best Left to Expert Bodies Like Pay Commissions, Unless Grave Error is Shown.

The dispute originated from the Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association's challenge before the Central Administrative Tribunal against the Un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal Order in CRPF Disciplinary Proceedings Due to High Court's Excessive Judicial Review. Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness, Not Merits or Evidence Re-evaluation, Under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) following departmental proceedings. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer in POCSO Bribery Case — Rule 5(1)(viii) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979. Petitioner found guilty of accepting bribe through peon for acquittal in POCSO case; disciplinary proceedings and removal upheld.

The Petitioner, a Judicial Officer appointed in 2009, was removed from service by the State of Maharashtra under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...