Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

4030 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4030 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Parricide Case on Ground of Insanity — Section 84 IPC Benefit Granted. Appellant decapitated his father but was found to be suffering from mental unsoundness at the time of incident, leading to acquittal under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Raju Babu Patel, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his father, Babu Patel, by deca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence and Unproven Motive. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Events.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Motiram and Sumanbai Phad for the murder of the appellant's wife, Surekha, who died due to burn ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Father Who Murdered His Two Children Due to Suspicion of Illegitimacy. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for double murder of daughter and son based on circumstantial evidence and extra-judicial confession.

The appellant, Syed Wahab Sayed Mir, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, in Sessions Trial No.31/2013 for the murder of his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances consistent only with guilt.

The appellant, Gangubai Kashinath Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 365/1994 for the murder of her hu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive and Last Seen Circumstance.

The appellants, four accused persons, were convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar, district Nanded, for the murder of one person u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Illicit Relationship. Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering victim with spade after being caught in compromising position with victim's wife.

The appellant, Manoj Bharat Vishwakarma, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Tallbaram Devagan, the husband of the complainant Yasho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals by Nilesh Baburao Gitte and Balasaheb Gangadhar Gitte against their conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Cod...