Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Lock and Seal Notice in Unauthorised Construction Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 56(2A) of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Notice Must Specify Time for Compliance Before Locking and Sealing; Failure to Do So Renders Notice Invalid.

The petitioner, R. Ashokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 24.10.2025 issued by the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Student Attendance Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII CPC not available to re-agitate merits where examination already concluded.

The applicant, Ankita Jagannath Sonawale, a post-graduate law student at Maharashtra National Law University, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, was disallowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Interest Claim on Fixed Deposit in Execution Proceedings. Court holds that interest on fixed deposit cannot be claimed under Section 151 CPC without specific provision in the decree or order.

The petitioner, Sri S.R. Venkatesh Babu, was the auction purchaser of a portion of the subject property in Execution Petition No.2420/2002 pending bef...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...