Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

8854 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8854 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010028192013_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates TDS Obligations of Turf Clubs on Stake Money Payments to Horse Owners under Income Tax Act. Interpretation of Section 194B and CBDT Circulars Central to Dispute over Characterization of Stake Money as Winnings.

The case involved writ petitions filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited, Mysore Race Club Limited, Karnataka Race Horse Owners Association, and an indiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.

The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents

The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Due to Tribunal's Excessive Interference. Tribunal Erred by Applying Criminal Standard of Proof and Revisiting Evidence De Novo Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Contrary to Limited Scope of Judicial Review.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a workman, R.C. Srivastava, by Standard Chartered Bank following a domestic enquiry into allegations of miscon...