Search Results for "vacate suit premises"

772 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 772 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Lease Dispute, Upholding Decree for Arrears and Charges. The lessee's claim for termination and damages was rejected as the lease agreement remained valid until vacation, and no rent waiver was agreed during COVID-19 lockdown under the leave and licence agreement.

The dispute arose from a leave and licence agreement dated 21.10.2019 between Sure Waves Media Tech Private Limited (lessee) and Mr. Fathiraj (lessor,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Irregular Deposit of Rent Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Does Not Bar Eviction. Tenant's failure to deposit rent regularly despite court order justified decree for possession.

The case involves a dispute between the landlord (respondent) and the tenant (applicant) over eviction from a flat in Mumbai. The landlord filed a sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Citizen Father Seeking Maintenance from Children Under Senior Citizens Act. Maintenance Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(2) Requiring Consideration of Children's Financial Capacity.

The petitioner, Govind Laxman Bawkar, a 75-year-old senior citizen, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Confirms Concurrent Findings on Limitation and Valuation. Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963 applies to suit for possession based on title, and valuation under Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959 is not a jurisdictional issue.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Gulbarga Bench, hears appeal against part decree in O.S. No. 125/2004 granting specific performance of oral agreement for sale.

The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an alleged oral agreement for sale of industrial property. The plaintiff (respondent No. 1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Shop; Adverse Possession Claim Rejected Under Limitation Act.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellant, who is the grand-daughter-in-law of the original plaintiff Gangabai Gilda. The suit property...