Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Citizen Father Seeking Maintenance from Children Under Senior Citizens Act. Maintenance Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(2) Requiring Consideration of Children's Financial Capacity.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Govind Laxman Bawkar, a 75-year-old senior citizen, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th April 2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandra, acting as the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Tribunal had dismissed the petitioner's application for maintenance against his children (respondent nos. 1 to 5). The petitioner sought maintenance from his son Sanjay Govind Bawkar and other children. The Tribunal dismissed the application on the ground that the petitioner had not proved his inability to maintain himself. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had not considered the financial capacity of the children as required under Section 4(2) of the Act. The court held that the obligation of children to maintain their parents is absolute, but the quantum of maintenance must be determined based on the financial capacity of the children. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, directing the Tribunal to consider the financial capacity of the children and pass a reasoned order within three months. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 4 - Obligation of children to maintain parents - The Tribunal must consider the financial capacity of the children before ordering maintenance. The order of maintenance dated 12th April 2021 was set aside as it did not consider the financial capacity of the children. (Paras 1-20)

B) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 5 - Application for maintenance - The application for maintenance must be filed in the prescribed form and the Tribunal must follow the procedure under Section 5. (Paras 1-20)

C) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 16 - Interim maintenance - The Tribunal may order interim maintenance pending final disposal of the application. (Paras 1-20)

D) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Section 23 - Appeal - An appeal lies against the order of the Tribunal to the Appellate Tribunal. (Paras 1-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, while ordering maintenance, must consider the financial capacity of the children and whether the order of maintenance can be passed without such consideration.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the order dated 12th April 2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandra, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The Tribunal was directed to consider the financial capacity of the children and pass a reasoned order within three months from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
  • 2007
  • Section 4
  • Section 5
  • Section 16
  • Section 23
  • Order of maintenance
  • Financial capacity of children
  • Obligation of children to maintain parents
  • Senior citizen's right to maintenance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 125

Writ Petition No. 10659 of 2023

2024-04-26

Gauri Godse

2024:BHC-AS:22387

Mr. Vijay Kurle, a/w, Ravindra Bhosale & Vikas Pawar, for Petitioner. Mr. Subhash Bane, a/w Titiksha Phadnis, for respondent nos. 1 to 5. Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP, for respondent nos. 6 to 8.

Govind Laxman Bawkar

Mrs. Pramila Prakash Sodye, Mr. Prakash Sakharam Sodye, Mr. Prasad Prakash Sodye, Mr. Sanjay Govind Bawkar, Chandrakant Govind Bawkar, The Sub-Divisional Officer alias Presiding Officer, Parents & Sr. Citizen Maintenance Tribunal, The Addl. Collector alias Presiding Officer, Parents & Sr. Citizen Maintenance Appellate Tribunal, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 dismissing the petitioner's application for maintenance.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to quash and set aside the order dated 12th April 2021 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandra, dismissing his application for maintenance, and sought a direction for maintenance from his children.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, a 75-year-old senior citizen, claimed that his children failed to maintain him and he was unable to maintain himself, hence he filed an application under the Senior Citizens Act for maintenance.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal (Sub-Divisional Officer) dismissed the application for maintenance on 12th April 2021. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, while ordering maintenance, must consider the financial capacity of the children? Whether the order of the Tribunal dismissing the maintenance application was sustainable in law?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the application without considering the financial capacity of the children and that the petitioner was unable to maintain himself. The respondents (children) argued that the petitioner had sufficient means to maintain himself and that the Tribunal's order was correct.

Ratio Decidendi

The obligation of children to maintain their parents under Section 4 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 is absolute, but the quantum of maintenance must be determined based on the financial capacity of the children. The Tribunal must consider the financial capacity of the children before ordering maintenance.

Judgment Excerpts

As per the order dated 19th March 2024, this petition is finally heard at the admission stage. This petition is filed to challenge an order of 12th April 2021, passed by the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 dismissing the application for maintenance.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application for maintenance before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bandra, acting as the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Tribunal dismissed the application on 12th April 2021. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. The High Court heard the petition finally at the admission stage on 19th March 2024 and delivered judgment on 26th April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Section 4, Section 5, Section 16, Section 23
  • Constitution of India: Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 -- Appellant Appeal Against State of Maharashtra and Others Fails -- Acquittal of Respondents Upheld
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Senior Citizen Father Seeking Maintenance from Children Under Senior Citizens Act. Maintenance Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Section 4(2) Requiring Consideration of Children's Financial Capacity.