Search Results for "time barred"

5368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Plea in Suit for Recovery and Declaration. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata Under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed against orders passed by the trial court rejecting applications under Order 7 Rule 11 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Reject Plaint in Suit for Conveyance and Amenities. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Claim for Conveyance is Continuing Cause of Action Not Barred by Limitation.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the applicants (defendants in the suit) challenging the order of the learned Senior Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...