Search Results for "state monopoly"

238 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 238 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Against Private Individuals for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Private individuals not being public servants, the FIR under PC Act was an abuse of process and quashed.

The petitioners, who are private individuals not holding any public office, filed petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Validity of Designation of Senior Advocates Without Framed Rules Under Advocates Act, 1961. Petitioners Seek to Quash Notifications and Require High Court to Frame Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates.

These writ petitions were filed in public interest by two advocates practicing in the High Court of Karnataka, challenging notifications dated 30.06.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Defendant's Logo Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Logo. Well-known mark entitled to protection across classes under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Reliance Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking injunctive reliefs against the Defendant, Concord Enviro Systems Pvt. Ltd., alleging inf...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Federation Against Labour Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workman Status Denied Due to Supervisory Role. Respondent's designation as Centre In-charge with supervisory duties excluded him from definition of 'workman' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Maryadit (the Federation) challenging the orde...