Search Results for "share alteration"

325 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 325 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Compensation Determination for Land and Structures Used for Road Construction. MCGM directed to acquire land under Section 296 of MMC Act and pay compensation in accordance with law.

The petitioners in two writ petitions challenged the determination of compensation by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for their lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010521472015_1

The plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in developing resorts and health clubs, entered into an agreement to purcha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Restore Appeal Dismissed for Breach of Undertaking. Undertaking given to court not to create third party rights in suit property is binding and its breach justifies dismissal of appeal.

The appellant, Shivaji Fakira Bhambare, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.41 of 2004 filed by the respondent, Dashrath Baburao Naik, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.

The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Suit Property Was Joint Family Property and Plaintiffs Were Entitled to Share.

The appellants, who were the defendants in a partition suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...