Search Results for "sales tax registration"

331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Action. Plaintiff's prior adoption and use of 'HOM' as acronym for 'House Of Mandarin' in restaurant services established, and defendant's adoption found not honest.

The plaintiff, Indian Express and Commercial Ventures and Projects Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Fu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Petition to Quash Sales Tax Attachment Over Secured Assets, Holding SARFAESI Act Priority Over State Dues. Secured Creditor's Claim Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides Crown Debt Under MVAT Act, Attachment Without Notice Invalid.

The Bank of Baroda, a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, had sanctioned credit facilities to M/s. Gajanan India Chemco between September 2009 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Reassessment — Prior Agreement Valuation Binding. Sale Deed Executed in Conformity with Assessed Agreement Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 31A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (Goa Amendment).

The petitioners, Mr. Sameer Vasudev Morajkar and Mrs. Prithvi B. Dessai, executed a sale deed dated 16.12.2020 in respect of property measuring 1900 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in VAT Evasion Case — IPC Offences Not Invokable When Special Statute Exists. FIR under IPC and MVAT Act quashed as investigation under MVAT Act must be by VAT authorities, not police, and IPC cannot be invoked for acts covered by special statute.

The petitioners, directors of G.S. Oils Ltd., challenged FIR No. 139/2012 registered at Police Station Wani for offences under Sections 406, 409, 420,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Clubbing of Establishments Under EPF Act. Common Ownership and Same Telephone Number Justify Clubbing for Coverage Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. Kiran Agencies, a proprietary firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged the order dated 30.03.2005 passed by the Em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Recovery of Excise Duty from Sick Industrial Company Without BIFR Consent. The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA bars coercive recovery of dues without prior consent of BIFR, protecting the petitioner-company's assets.

The petitioner, Polymermann (ASIA) P. Ltd., is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of polymer chemicals, with its factory at MIDC, Ambad, Na...