Search Results for "reverse presumption"

469 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 469 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.35,000/- on Ground of 'Account Closed' Attracts Section 138 NI Act; Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment Not Proved.

The appellant, Vithal @ Vithoba Gorakh Shinde, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Restores Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Financial Capacity to Advance Loan and Legally Enforceable Debt Established, Reversing Acquittal by Sessions Court.

The appellant, Krishna Gopal Khetan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rape Case, Holds Offences Under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC Form Same Transaction for Joint Trial Under Section 220 CrPC. The Court set aside the discharge of the accused for lack of territorial jurisdiction and directed trial for all offences together.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order upholding the discharge of the accused-respondent No. 2 for the offence under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Under Section 304 Part I for Causing Deaths in Property Dispute — High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Upheld as Evidence of Injured Witnesses Was Credible and Unexplained Injuries on Accused Did Not Discredit Prosecution Case

The case arises from a property dispute between two families in Nallappanahalli village, Karnataka. On 15 March 1995, during a survey of houses, a ver...