Search Results for "redemption right"

278 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reforming Sentencing Practices in Indian Criminal Justice: Towards Fairness and Consistency Navigating Legal Precedents and Recommendations for Systematic Change

Compiles excerpts from various legal sources and cases concerning sentencing guidelines and procedures in the Indian criminal justice system. It discu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Suit for Specific Performance on Ground of Territorial Jurisdiction. Agreement Executed at Aurangabad Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 20(c) CPC, Despite Property Being in Vaijapur.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract of sale and perpetual injunction in the Court of Civil Judge S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Standing Orders in Customs Valuation Dispute — Mandates Acceptance of Declared Transaction Value. Petitioner's imported goods detained on suspicion of undervaluation; court holds that without proper inquiry under Customs Act, 1962, rejection of transaction value is arbitrary.

The Petitioner, The Supreme Industries Ltd., a company in the plastics industry, imported goods and filed bills of entry declaring the transaction val...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery Case. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, finding no grounds for interference.

The petitioners, Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited and two individuals, were original respondents in an arbitration proceeding initiated by New ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...