Search Results for "ready forward"

1110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entries in Mutation Proceedings — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Decide Based on Possession and Revenue Records, Not Title Disputes.

The petitioners, Navin Popatlal Shah and Nitin Sundraji Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Defendant’s Appeal and Dismisses Plaintiff’s Appeal in Specific Performance Suit. Oral Agreement to Reconvey Property Not Proved; Decree Based on Defendant’s Written Statement Admission Set Aside Due to Non-Acceptance by Plaintiff.

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to reconvey property. The plaintiff, originally the owner of the suit prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Plaintiff Prefers First Appeal Against Trial Court’s Partial Decree in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Had Denied Specific Performance Due to Public Policy and Fabricated Receipts, Granting Only Refund of Admitted Advance.

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of two sale agreements dated January 6, 2003, concerning 8 acres of land in Salem District...