Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In

Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results
Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal Against Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken Prior to Act's Commencement Precludes Deemed Lapse Despite Non-Payment of Compensation.

28 Apr 2023

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition of land in question had lapse...

By Lawtext
  • 155
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Govt. of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Deemed Not Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1983, Compensation Not Tendered, but Twin Conditions of Possession and Compensation Must Both Be Unsatisfied for Lapse.

15 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the Delhi High Court's judgment dated 01.12.2015 in Writ Petition (C) No.27 of 2015, which declared th...

By Lawtext
  • 92
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Land Acquisition Collector in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overruled Precedent Leads to Reversal. Possession Taken in 2004 Precludes Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by the Land Acquisition Collector (South East), Delhi Government, against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 25.04...

By Lawtext
  • 91
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside. Compensation Non-Payment Does Not Automatically Trigger Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had declared t...

By Lawtext
  • 71
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government of NCT of Delhi's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Initiated by Landowners. The Court held that when possession could not be taken due to court orders obtained by landowners, the period of interim orders is excluded in computing five years for lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the High Court of Delhi's judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 2709 of 2015, which declared that land acq...

By Lawtext
  • 213
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Preventing Possession. The Court held that where possession could not be taken due to pending litigation initiated by landowners, the acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...

By Lawtext
  • 81
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Declaration of Lapsed Acquisition — Subsequent Purchaser Has No Locus to Challenge Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 2007 Precludes Deemed Lapse as Both Possession and Compensation Must Be Unpaid for Five Years.

2 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and another against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declar...

By Lawtext
  • 89
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court Order Set Aside Due to Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation. Acquisition Proceedings Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 When Possession Has Been Taken.

2 Dec 2022

The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which declared that the acquisition proceedings under the Land Ac...

By Lawtext
  • 100
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Land Acquisition Collector in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Compensation Deposited in Court Sufficient Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. High Court's declaration of lapse set aside as per Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.

2 Dec 2022

The case pertains to land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land in village Chattarpur, New Delhi. A notifica...

By Lawtext
  • 201
 © Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation Employment Dispute Due to Insufficient Proof of Landholding. Eligibility for Employment Under Tripartite Agreement Requires Documentary Evidence of Minimum 2 Acres, and Self-Serving Affidavits from Relatives Do Not Satisfy This Criterion Under the Rehabilitation Scheme.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a claim for employment under a rehabilitation scheme following land acquisition for the Sonepur Bazari Open Cast Project in Wes...

By Lawtext
  • 192
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal Natural Justice murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?