Search Results for "priority disposal"

313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer Validity and Limitation. Rectification of Register of Members under Sections 59 and 88 of Companies Act, 2013 requires proof of valid share transfer and petition within limitation.

The case involves an appeal by Chalasani Udaya Shankar and others against M/s. Lexus Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and others, arising from a company petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Candidates Seeking Appointment from Expired Ranked List. No Right to Appointment Arises After Ranked List Expiry, Even for Vacancies Reported Later.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of civil appeals filed by candidates empanelled in the first Ranked List (RLI) dated 11.9.2013 for the post of Sub...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...