WRIT PETITION NO.4761 OF 2024
19 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "prior restraint"
962 result(s) found
Found 962 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Application Challenging Summons Under PMLA and Restraints on Arrest. Application Seeks Quashing of Summonses Issued Under Section 50 PMLA and Directions to Permit Authorized Representation, Restrict Arrest Under Section 19, and Transfer Investigation to SIT.
29 Oct 2021The application arose from allegations against a former Home Minister of Maharashtra. On 20 March 2021, the then Commissioner of Police wrote a letter...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Editor-in-Chief in Abetment to Suicide Case — High Court Erred in Declining Bail Without Prima Facie Evaluation of FIR. Non-Payment of Dues Alone Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC.
27 Nov 2020The appellant, Arnab Manoranjan Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, was arrested on 4 November 2020 in connection with FIR No. 59 of 2018 registe...
- 533
High Court
High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'
11 May 2012The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.
21 Apr 2022The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor's Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender Process; Holds Filing of False Documents Renders Bidder Ineligible. The Court Rules That Lowest Bidder Acquires No Vested Right Before Final Approval by Competent Authority, Upholding Rejection Under Clause Permitting Rejection of Any Tender.
18 Dec 2019The writ petition arose from a tender floated by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation for reconstruction of a bus stand at Beed. The petit...
- 32
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.
27 Feb 2020The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...
- 242
Supreme Court
Supreme Court upholds High Court's Quashing of Criminal Proceedings Under SC/ST Act, Holding Conversion to Christianity Does Not entitle Caste-Based Protection.
24 Mar 2026The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh quashing criminal proceedings against accused persons under Section 482 of the Co...
- 700
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition and Civil Revision Application Concerning Statutory Renewal of Lease under Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act, 1976. The core legal question was whether a government company lessee had a statutory right to renew a 35-year lease beyond its original term without fresh agreement, and whether the acquisition Act's renewal provisions were constitutionally valid.
8 Oct 2021The litigation arose out of a lease deed executed on 29.10.1969 between Modern India Limited, as lessor, and Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.
15 Nov 2024The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...
- 474
