Search Results for "interregnum period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "interregnum period"

620 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 620 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Grant Under PTCL Act Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Petitioner's Mother Acquired Land in 1967, But Proceedings Initiated in 2011 Without Notice to Petitioner.

6 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Sri R. Suresh Mohan, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 09.10.20...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Land Ceiling Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Revision Application under Section 89A of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 held time-barred and without proper notice.

12 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/S Anchor Daewoo Industries Ltd, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days. Mere 'Seen' Remark on Application Under Section 316(5) BNS Does Not Constitute Valid Extension of Remand Under Section 187(3) BNSS.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MPID Act Case Due to Non-Filing of Charge-Sheet Within 60 Days and Lack of Speaking Order for Remand Extension. The court held that the mere remark 'seen' on an application under Section 316(5) BNS does not satisfy the requirement of a reasoned order under Section 187(3) BNSS, entitling the accused to default bail.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioners, Ranganth Tulshiram Galande and Anil Zumbarrao Darekar, were arrested on 07.07.2025 in connection with Crime No. 673 of 2025 registere...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

6 Jun 2025

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

Madras High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Land Record Disputes. The Court Considers the Validity of Orders Passed by Revenue Authorities Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

20 Mar 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Leave Encashment to Retired Judge Appointed as President of State Consumer Commission. Petitioner entitled to leave encashment under Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 for entire tenure, not limited to COVID-19 period.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Justice Ashok Pitambar Bhangale, a retired Judge of the Bombay High Court, was appointed as the President of the Maharashtra State Con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Rent Control Jurisdiction Dispute - Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Eviction of Statutory Tenant Under Haryana Rent Act. The Court held that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a suit for possession as the subject property is governed by the Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, and the respondents are statutory tenants who can only be evicted under Section 13 of that Act.

28 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute over jurisdiction in a possession suit concerning leased land in Kaithal, Haryana. The appellants, as owners, had leas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Not Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioners, Dattatraya Ankush Pathade and Sonali Satish Wakade, were arrested in connection with Crime No.416 of 2020 registered at Shrigonda Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Limitation Period for Filing Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Computed from Date of Cause of Action. The court held that the cause of action arises on the day following the expiry of 15 days from receipt of notice, and complaints filed within one month from that date are within limitation.

16 Mar 2011

The applicant, M/s. Airsonic Travels Pvt. Ltd., through its representative Pramod Atmaram Rane, was the original complainant in three complaints under...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)