High Court of Karnataka Reserves Order on OCI Cardholder's Plea for Admission to Medical Courses Under Hyderabad-Karnataka Quota. Petition Challenged Citizenship Requirement in Admission Notification for Government Seats.
4 Sep 2024...
Search Results for "foreign property"
1059 result(s) found
Found 1059 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
22 Feb 2019The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...
- 153
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.
19 Mar 2013The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Union of India Against Acquittal in Customs Gold Smuggling Case. Failure to Examine Material Witnesses and Prove Smuggled Origin of Gold Leads to Upholding of Acquittal Under Customs Act, 1962.
8 Jan 2020The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for offences under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Imp...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Matters to Final Hearing on Whether Pre-execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Orders Can Be on Grounds Beyond Alka Subhash Gadia Exceptions. The Court Examined if New Grounds Such as Absence of Live Link and Delay Could Be Used to Challenge Detention Orders Before Execution.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of matters challenging detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugg...
- 73
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.
16 Feb 2026The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.
8 Feb 2012The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...
- 99
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears and Reserves Order on Interim Measures in Intellectual Property Dispute with Foreign Seated Arbitration. Petition Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Questions Indian Court's Jurisdiction and Maintainability of Mandatory Injunction.
31 Jul 2026The applicant, a Singapore-incorporated company engaged in software development, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2024The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Mar 2026The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...
- 294
