Search Results for "forcible sexual intercourse"

339 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 339 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366, 343, 376 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.65/2014 for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sandeep son of Kaniram Rathod, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and POCSO Offences, Upholding Ten-Year Sentence. Age of Victim Proved Through School Records; Consent of Minor Held Immaterial Under POCSO Act.

The judgment dealt with a criminal appeal preferred by the accused against his conviction and sentence for sexual offences against a minor under the I...