Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act to Order Upholding Majority Arbitral Award. Arbitral Tribunal Had Set Aside Termination of CISP Agreement Due to Insufficient Proof of Corruption and Awarded Compensation.

The appellant, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Limited (formerly SABMiller India Limited), a beer manufacturing and brewing company, appealed under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Under Section 14 of Admiralty Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Defendant's Notice of Motion. The dispute concerned breach of a bareboat charterparty and a subsequent time charterparty regarding a vessel.

The original plaintiff, Siem Offshore Rederi AS, a Norwegian company, filed Admiralty Suit (L) No. 20 of 2018 before the Bombay High Court against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...