Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Conflicting Divisions on Whether Under Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Time Limit for Caste Validity Certificate is Directory or Mandatory. The Reference Arises from a Writ Petition Challenging Automatic Termination of a Councillor's Election for Non-Production of Caste Validity Certificate Within Six Months.

9 Dec 2016

The reference arose out of a writ petition challenging the election of a councillor from a reserved ward for Other Backward Classes (OBC) women in Bho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court Held That a Preliminary Inquiry Is Not Mandatory Before FIR Registration and the FIR Should Not Be Quashed as It Discloses a Cognizable Offence Based on Source Information.

8 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Telangana High Court dated 11 February 2020, which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondents under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bihar State Electricity Board's Appeal Against Retrospective Promotion Order — Kal Awadhi is Eligibility Criterion, Not Entitlement to Immediate Promotion. The Court held that promotion is effective from the date of grant, not from the date of vacancy, and that completion of qualifying service does not create a right to automatic promotion.

26 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Bihar State Electricity Board against the judgment of the Patna High Court Division Bench which had ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Head Mistress Against School Tribunal Order Restoring Respondent Teacher to Head Post - Appointment of Appellant Held Valid Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

15 Feb 2006

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Smt. Nirmala Revappa Pattanshetti against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CBI to Bring Authorization Order on Record in Corruption Case. Procedural Lapse Does Not Bar Subsequent Application Under Section 173(2)(5)(a) CrPC; Substantive Justice Prevails Over Technicalities.

7 May 2019

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, CBI, against the dismissal of its application to bring on rec...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of GPSC Recommendations for Junior Scale Officer Posts. The Court Examined Whether the Cabinet Decision Was Arbitrary and Violative of Constitutional Guarantees.

21 Dec 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Cabinet decision of the Government of Goa. The dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim Beyond 90 Days — Condonation of Delay Granted Due to Court Vacations and Lack of Objection. Order 8 Rule 6A CPC does not prescribe a specific period for filing written statement to counterclaim; the period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.177/2007/A, challenged the order dated 20-8-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior D...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)