Search Results for "developer permission"

635 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 635 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Petitions Against Infrastructure Cost Levies by Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. The Petitions Raise Constitutional and Statutory Challenges Under Articles 14, 265 and the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

The dispute arose from demands for infrastructure cost and STP charges made by the Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (NMRDA) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...