Search Results for "demand promissory note"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Injunction in Share Dispute Case. Court Restrains Transfer of Shares Allegedly Misappropriated Pending Suit, Holding That a Prima Facie Case of Fraud and Breach of Trust Was Made Out.

The appellant, Pushpanjali Tie Up Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit alleging that respondent No.1, Renudevi Choudhary, and respondent No.2, Ekta Choudhary (her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt and Notice Was Not Properly Served.

The revision petition was filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Due to Non-Prosecution and Lack of Evidence — Original Plaintiff Failed to Prove Loan Transaction, Decree Set Aside.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, decreeing a suit for recovery of Rs. 60,000 with interest a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons and Non-Prosecution. Decree Set Aside as Defendant Was Not Given Opportunity to Defend.

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, decreeing the suit for recovery of Rs. 60,000 with ...