Search Results for "deemed settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "deemed settlement"

1758 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1758 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Dispute Over Sale of Shares and Property Rights. Court holds that the applicant failed to make out a prima facie case for interim relief under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as the balance of convenience did not favour granting injunction against the plaintiffs.

30 Nov -0001

The present interim application was filed by the original defendant No. 1, Babasaheb Neelkant Kalyani, in a suit for specific performance and injuncti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Attachment and Proposed Sale of Residential Bungalow under Income Tax Act, 1961, on Ground of Limitation. Petitioner Contends That Tax Recovery Officer's Action Is Time-Barred Under Rule 68B of Second Schedule.

5 Jun 2017

The petitioner, a 60-year-old Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

19 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Suit Maintainability in Land Declaration Dispute After Finding Notice Under Section 80 CPC by Karta Sufficient for Divided Coparceners. Karta’s Notice Given While Family Joint Held to Enure for Benefit of All Coparceners Despite Subsequent Partition, as Substantial Identity Existed Between Notice-Giver and Plaintiffs under Section 80 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

11 Mar 1969

The dispute arose from a declaratory suit filed by Beohar Rajendra Sinha and his three grandsons against the State of Madhya Pradesh seeking a declara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age of Workmen. Workmen who opted for NTC service conditions cannot claim retirement at 60 years under earlier settlement and award.

12 Apr 2006

The petitioners, workmen of India United Mills, Mumbai, which was taken over by the National Textile Corporation under the Sick Textiles Undertakings ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award on Retirement Age in Industrial Disputes Act Cases. Employee of Amalgamated Company Seeks Retirement at 58 Years Despite Unit-Specific Standing Orders of 55 Years.

6 Sep 2022

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, operated two independent industrial establishments: the Hosur Road unit and the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross-Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order on Retirement Age. Settlement Between Parties Fixing Retirement at 55 Years Held Binding; Application for Modification Without Union Support Deemed Not Maintainable.

26 Jul 2012

The case involved cross-writ petitions before the Bombay High Court arising from a dispute over the age of retirement of workmen at Hotel Ramada Plaza...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeals Against Reinstatement of Contractual Employees in Industrial Dispute Matter — Held That Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Is Void and Employees Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages.

3 Mar 2025

The present batch of civil appeals arises from a common judgment of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) which dismissed the writ petitions filed by t...

14 15 16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)