Search Results for "customs adjudication"

686 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 686 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs in Central Excise Case — CESTAT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Processing of Cotton Fabrics with Aid of Power Without Following Excise Procedures Constitutes Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot against an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Communication Restraining Property Transfer Without Authority of Law. Communication directing society not to permit transfer of flat without NOC from Customs held without legal sanction and violative of Article 300A of Constitution.

The petitioner, Smt. Supriya Chokhara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Consider Reward to Informer's Widow Under Circular 20/2015 — Withholding of Reward Unjustified. The court held that the reward policy must be applied and the widow's representation must be considered within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre, is the widow of a deceased informer who provided specific information to the Marine and Preventive Wing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Withdrawal of Customs Duty Exemption Certificate for Medical Equipment Imported by Cardiologist. Failure to Treat 40% Outdoor and 10% Indoor Poor Patients Free Not Established; Exemption Restored.

The petitioners, Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, a practicing cardiologist, and M/s National Heart Center & Hypertension Clinic, challenged the ord...