Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1602 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1602 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence and Unproven Motive. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Events.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Motiram and Sumanbai Phad for the murder of the appellant's wife, Surekha, who died due to burn ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony. Prosecution Failed to Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC for Offences Under Sections 302, 323, 341 IPC.

The defacto complainant, father of the deceased Gopinath, filed this criminal appeal under Section 372 CrPC against the judgment of acquittal dated 06...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balu @ Balkrushna Gangadhar Chavan, in Sessions Case No. 92 of 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Bhagya Mandavkar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Mangaon, for the murder of Savitri Sagar Pawar under Section 302 IPC read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was not corroborated and identification parade was not conducted properly.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal against the conviction of the appellant-accused for offences under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Second Appeal in Property Dispute: Unregistered Sale Deed and Adverse Possession. The Substantial Questions of Law Include Whether Unregistered Sale Deed Can Be Used Collaterally to Establish Possession for Adverse Possession.

The present regular second appeal was filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff, Sudheendra Rao Kasabe, challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as last seen witness testimony was unnatural and contradictory.

The appellant, Nazira w/o Anwarkhan, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 9th February 2001 in Sessions Case No.305 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 Overturned as Witness Testimonies Were Inconsistent and Failed to Inspire Confidence.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by ...