Search Results for "compromise behind back"

337 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 337 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Third Party Impleadment in Property Appeal — Applicants Claiming Adverse Possession Must Be Heard. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC invoked to join parties with independent title claims to ensure complete adjudication.

The present application was filed by two applicants, Khalil Haji Bholumiya Salar and Bilkis Mehboobsaheb Mujawar, seeking impleadment in First Appeal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...