Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "commercial rent"
809 result(s) found
Found 809 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Case Based on Subletting by Bank Tenant Following Statutory Amalgamation. Amalgamation of Hindustan Commercial Bank with Punjab National Bank under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 constitutes transfer of tenancy rights without landlord's consent, amounting to subletting under Section 14(1)(b) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
1 Jan 2026The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an eviction decree passed by the Rent Control Tribunal. The appellan...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Revision Applications by Tenant and Landlord in Mesne Profits Dispute. Court Upholds Small Causes Court's Fixation of Mesne Profits and 9% Interest Rate Under Section 34 CPC.
10 Sep 2024The judgment involves cross civil revision applications filed by the tenant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), and the landlord, M/s. Forbe...
- 491
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Housing Board's Notification Restricting Allotment of Commercial Sites to Landowners in Land Acquisition Case. Condition No. 2 of Notification Dated 03.09.2016 Limiting Allotment to Residential Sites Only Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary.
9 Aug 2024The petitioners, Yallappa S/o Somappa Kori and others, were landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Housing Board for a housing scheme. ...
- 150
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Involving Sub-Lease Dispute — Holds That Lease Disputes Under Transfer of Property Act Are Arbitrable. The Court ruled that disputes arising from a sub-lease deed governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 are arbitrable, and since the petitioner is a foreign national, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
18 Dec 2020The petitioner, Suresh Shah, a Kenyan national and habitual resident of Nairobi, Kenya, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Co...
- 195
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Oral Tenancy After Mortgage Not Protected. Tenant's claim of tenancy based on oral agreement after mortgage creation cannot defeat bank's right to take possession under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.
11 Sep 2019The present appeal arises from an order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai, dated 31.12.2014, rejecting the application of the ap...
- 294
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
7 Aug 2018The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.
5 Mar 2018The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Decree for Possession in Rent Control Suit — Tenant Status Upheld Under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court found sufficient evidence that the respondent was carrying on business with the original tenant at the time of his death, and the concurrent findings on area were not perverse.
22 Jul 2015The petitioners, M/s. Dattakrupa Construction & Anr., filed a civil revision application challenging the orders dated 27 May 2013 and 13 May 2015 pass...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.
28 Aug 2013The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...
- 95
