Search Results for "bonus claim"

360 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award in Wage Reference Due to Failure to Apply Settled Principles. The Court Remands the Proceedings for Fresh Adjudication, Holding That Both Region-cum-Industry and Parity Principles Were Not Properly Followed.

This judgment from the Bombay High Court concerns three writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage reference between Hin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wage Parity Claim by Non-Technical Officers of MSEB. Non-technical officers cannot claim parity with technical officers as they form separate classes under the Electricity Supply Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M.S.E.B. Officers' Association and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking wage parity for non-te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Unfair Labour Practices in Workmen's Claim for Permanency. Industrial Court Order Under MRTU & PULP Act Challenged; Project Worker Status and 240 Days Service at Issue.

The present writ petitions were filed by the employer, a public limited company engaged in electricity generation and distribution, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...